- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:01:20 +0000
- To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocad.ca>, AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Jan, Thanks, that covers what I was trying to say well. Does anyone see an issue with strengthening the SC in this way? Kind regards, -Alastair > PROPOSED WORDING: > ================= > (was B.1.1.1) Accessible Content Possible (WCAG): If the authoring tool > provides authors with the ability to add or modify web content so that > a WCAG 2.0 success criterion is applicable, then authors can use the > authoring tool to meet the success criterion. > The WCAG 2.0 Level A success criteria are met (Level A); or > The WCAG 2.0 Level A and Level AA success criteria are met (Level AA); > or > The WCAG 2.0 Level A, Level AA, and Level AAA success criteria are met > (Level AAA).
Received on Monday, 20 December 2010 12:02:06 UTC