- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:57:41 -0500
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi all, This proposal is a response to a discussion Alastair and I recently had about B.1.1.1 being a very low bar (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010OctDec/0097.html) in which Alastair suggested strengthening it. The structure is similar to the checking requirement SC(was B.2.2.1) PROPOSED WORDING: ================= (was B.1.1.1) Accessible Content Possible (WCAG): If the authoring tool provides authors with the ability to add or modify web content so that a WCAG 2.0 success criterion is applicable, then authors can use the authoring tool to meet the success criterion. The WCAG 2.0 Level A success criteria are met (Level A); or The WCAG 2.0 Level A and Level AA success criteria are met (Level AA); or The WCAG 2.0 Level A, Level AA, and Level AAA success criteria are met (Level AAA). CURRENT WORDING: ================ (was B.1.1.1) Accessible Content Production (WCAG): Authors can use the authoring tool to produce accessible web content (WCAG): [Implementing B.2.1.1] The WCAG 2.0 Level A success criteria are met (Level A); or The WCAG 2.0 Level A and Level AA success criteria are met (Level AA); or The WCAG 2.0 Level A, Level AA, and Level AAA success criteria are met (Level AAA). -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University
Received on Saturday, 18 December 2010 21:58:22 UTC