- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:02:26 -0400
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-minutes
IRC Log:
http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-irc
Action Items
ACTION: jeanne to find out when the UK zakim line will be
fixed
ACTION: Jeanne to make a survey of available dates for the
face to face using a date range of 8-24 of September
Text of Minutes:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WAI AU
21 Jun 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0085.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-irc
Attendees
Present
+1.617.324.aaaa, jeanne, Jan, Alastair, Greg_Pisocky, AnnM,
Jutta, AndrewR, Tim_Boland, [IPcaller], AlastairC, GregP,
JanR, JeanneS, JuttaT
Regrets
Sueann, N.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]1. Last Call publishing update (Jeanne S.)
2. [6]2. New "Implementing ATAG 2.0" text
3. [7]3. IMPLEMENTATION GATHERING
4. [8]B.2.1.2 Set Accessible Properties:
5. [9]B.2.4.2 Automated suggestions
6. [10]B.2.5.1 Templates Accessible (WCAG Level A)
7. [11]B.3.2.2 Reactivate Option:
8. [12]B.3.3.1 Instructions
9. [13]B.3.4.1 Model Accessible Practice (WCAG Level A)
10. [14]A.1.1.2 Web-Based Accessible (WCAG Level AA):
11. [15]A.4.1.3 Undo is Reversible
* [16]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<AnnM> Hey.
<AnnM> Is Zakim's UK number still having problems?
<jeanne> let me check...
using skype.
<AnnM> ok, I'll try that.
<jeanne> 1 617.761.6200
<AnnM> is the UK number going to be active again any time soon?
sorry Jeanne says no ETA on fixing it
<AnnM> yeah.
<scribe> ACTION: jeanne to find out when the UK zakim line will be
fixed [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-283 - Find out when the UK zakim line will
be fixed [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2010-06-28].
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0085.h
tml
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0085.html
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0085.h
tml
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0085.html
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
1. Last Call publishing update (Jeanne S.)
Jeanne: Allowed to publish...sent out updated draft a few mins ago
... Hopefully people will look at it
... I have to convert it to a LC working draft
Jenane: No more rodblocks
Jeanne: No more rodblocks
JT: Given that when we will schedule LC has implications on F2F
timing...
Jeanne: Suggested we have 8 week review period.
... Assuming we go this week...
... We are looking at any time after Fri Aug 27....
... Really looking at end of aug, start of sept.
JT, GP: Better mid-Sept
JT: In terms of a host, we could do it (OCAD)
... Any probs for US companies?
GP: Not for me (adobe)
JT: I'll start the process at our end
<jeanne> not for me
JT: We will be right downtown...Island Airport very close
... We will need a survey of dates in Sept.
Jeanne: Range?
JT: I have ISO meeting week of Sept. 7.
Jeanne: For me ok after Sept. 8th
... From Sept 8-24 range for survey?
2. New "Implementing ATAG 2.0" text
[20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0083.h
tml
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0083.html
<jeanne> ACTION: Jeanne to make a survey of available dates for the
face to face using a date range of 8-24 of Sseptember [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-284 - Make a survey of available dates for
the face to face using a date range of 8-24 of Sseptember [on Jeanne
Spellman - due 2010-06-28].
AC: I see this as a key problem for some CMS tools
... I think it should be normative...but I'm not sure at what point
something rises to that level
... The text sounds fine for the informative...but I wonder what the
criteria are for a new normative success criterion
<jeanne>
[22]http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2010/ED-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20100621/#s
c_a311
[22] http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2010/ED-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20100621/#sc_a311
AC: I had seen a browser-based example where there was a long
UI-distance between the selected text and the operators
JR: I def. think its covered but we can't always control for bad
usabilitity implementations
Resolution: All accepted:
[23]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0083.h
tml
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0083.html
3. IMPLEMENTATION GATHERING
JR: I believe that people had said implementations would be coming
soon
GP: I believe so, some things have just become available
JT: Can others who are on the call begin looking around for
implementations
... Can we quickly try to see how far we can get...
B.2.1.2 Set Accessible Properties:
<jeanne>
[24]http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca/public/atag/implementation_report_re
v5.html
[24] http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca/public/atag/implementation_report_rev5.html
B.2.4.2 Automated suggestions
B.2.5.1 Templates Accessible (WCAG Level A)
B.2.5.2 Provide Accessible Templates:
B.3.2.1 Active by Default
B.3.2.2 Reactivate Option:
B.3.3.1 Instructions
B.3.4.1 Model Accessible Practice (WCAG Level A)
A.1.1.2 Web-Based Accessible (WCAG Level AA):
A.4.1.3 Undo is Reversible
Next meeting is June 28
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: jeanne to find out when the UK zakim line will be
fixed [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to make a survey of available dates for the
face to face using a date range of 8-24 of Sseptember [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2010/06/21-au-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 21:02:37 UTC