- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:25:25 -0400
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi all, Here is a first shot at my action item from the call. I haven't looked it over thoroughly, but I wanted to follow up quickly on our discussion today: 1. In B.1.1... REMOVE Guideline B.1 (this would actually match WCAG 2.0 which doesn't have their "accessibility supported" stuff as a success criteria - instead it is a "conformance requirement") 2. In the ATAG 2.0 conformance profile... 5(b) Included Technologies: A list of the *Web content technologies* (including version numbers) produced by the *authoring tool* that the Claimant is *including* in the conformance claim. - The *authoring tool* must meet the requirements of ATAG 2.0 during the production of each technology on the list. - The list must include any *Web content technologies* that are automatically selected by the *authoring tool* (e.g., for *automatic content generation*, as the default technology for *author-generated content*). - For each *Web content technology*, provide information on how the technology might be used to create accessible Web content (e.g., provide links to technology-specific techniques) 5(c [was d]) Excluded Technologies: A list of any *Web content technologies* produced by the the *authoring tool* that the Claimant is *excluding* from the conformance claim. - The *authoring tool* is not required to meet the requirements of ATAG 2.0 during the production of the technologies on this list. - *Web content Technologies* may only be excluded that are not automatically selected by the *authoring tool*. Cheers, Jan
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 21:35:42 UTC