- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:21:33 -0400
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Comment at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-atag2-comments/2009May/0001.html My comments marked with JR: ======== > I think it's worth considering to merge success criterias which differ > in wcag level only, e.g: > B.3.1.1 Accessible Options Prominent (Level A) > B.3.1.2 Accessible Options Prominent (Level AA) > B.3.1.3 Accessible Options Prominent (Level AAA) > > Some of these success criterias are listed one after the other, in other > cases different success criterias are in between the > "similar-except-for-wcag-level" criterias. JR: When we had these formulated as one "Relative Priority" Checkpoint, it was a source of confusion. That said, I'm open to ideas for more intuitive phrasing. Just remember it will also require reworking the levels of conformance explanations. Cheers, Jan -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Lead Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 16:22:08 UTC