- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 10:49:24 -0500
- To: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- CC: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Hi Tim, Yes, it is possible to move things back, especially due to the unexpectedly major nature of the recent changes. I think that the push we made to finish has been positive as it has led to quite a bit of progress. Cheers, Jan Tim Boland wrote: > > Just to be clear, my most recent email to the list was to comment on > Jan's rewrite of Jutta's success criteria. My earlier email was > commenting directly on Jutta's success criteria. > Sorry for any confusion. > > On another point, I'm wondering what is the motivation for voting on > last call of ATAG2.0 by Nov 15? It seems to me like we are making quite > a few non-editorial (substantive) changes to ATAG2.0 now, and I would > like adequate time to review the changes made in the context of the > entire document before announcing last call. I think we should review > the document one last time to make sure it's really what we want, even > if it takes an extra week or two. > > Does anybody else in the group feel "rushed"? Is it possible to move > the Nov15 date back by a week or two? What do other members of the > group think? I apologize if there is something I'm not understanding.. > > Thanks and best wishes, > Tim Boland NIST > > -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 15:50:31 UTC