W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Conformance Evaluation Page Ideas

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:16:23 -0400
Message-ID: <3CBAEEC7.1F1C489B@utoronto.ca>
To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Carlos A Velasco wrote:
> Dear Jan,
> I reviewed the page, and I think it reflects the discussion Monday.
> Three comments:
> * The proposed template is too long. Maybe we shall review it in one of
> the WG meetings. As we discussed off-the-list, maybe we shall develop a
> review XML Schema that will allow for different views of a review
> through an XSLT transformation.

We'll see what we can do. Of course ATAG is very long (with Relative
Priority checkpoints expanded), so I'm not sure how much the template
can be shortened.

> * The Bluefish tool is not part of OpenOffice.org, but sponsored by a
> Dutch company called OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.nl/


> * Tools not evaluated maybe shall be in another page.

I agree with Charles that its nice to have them on the same page - it
makes the transition from unevaluated to evaluated more visible.



Jan Richards
UI Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
University of Toronto

Phone: (416) 946-7060
Fax: (416) 971-2896

Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 11:16:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:28:27 UTC