- From: Carlos A Velasco <velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 20:24:48 +0200
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Dear Jan, I reviewed the page, and I think it reflects the discussion Monday. Three comments: * The proposed template is too long. Maybe we shall review it in one of the WG meetings. As we discussed off-the-list, maybe we shall develop a review XML Schema that will allow for different views of a review through an XSLT transformation. * The Bluefish tool is not part of OpenOffice.org, but sponsored by a Dutch company called OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.nl/ * Tools not evaluated maybe shall be in another page. Regards, carlos Jan Richards wrote: > Hi all, > > I have put together a prototype of how the conformance page might look. > > http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/~jan/WAI/tools2.html > > 1. The disclaimer for the page is given more visibility. > 2. The process we were discussing yesterday on the call has been spelled > out and placed at the end of the page. > 3. The process section includes a link to the conformance evaluation > template that I sent out several months ago. I have updated the template > with the review disclaimer and the required review information. > 4. As a space saving measure, only tools with evaluations have a row in > the table. The others are placed in a single row at the bottom. I have > only done this with markup editor category so far, but if people like > it, I'll do the same with the other categories. > > Comments? Do the process steps cover all that we discussed yesterday? > > Cheers, > Jan > -- Dr Carlos A Velasco mailto:velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik (FIT.HEB) [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.HEB)] Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609/319272 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2002 14:24:53 UTC