- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Carlos A Velasco <velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- cc: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Carlos A Velasco wrote: Dear Jan, I reviewed the page, and I think it reflects the discussion Monday. Three comments: * The proposed template is too long. Maybe we shall review it in one of the WG meetings. As we discussed off-the-list, maybe we shall develop a review XML Schema that will allow for different views of a review through an XSLT transformation. CMN Well, that would be cool. In the meantime we could use a standardised XHTML format that can be transformed, or can be read straight out in browsers - I think that it is easier for people to edit XHTML but I notice that even then a lot of editors are in practise producing buggy code... [snip] Carlos * Tools not evaluated maybe shall be in another page. CMN That was how it used to be, and I have to admit that I prefer Jan's approach of having all the tools together. I guess this is a good question for a poll <grin/> cheers Charles
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 11:05:53 UTC