- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:34:05 -0800
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
At 03:18 PM 2/27/01 -0500, Jan Richards wrote:
>resounding silence
"Include equivalent alternatives for all supported image formats that allow
text content, including PNG, SVG, WebCGM, JPEG, and GIF. (required)"
This somehow sounds like an instruction to a Web designer rather than to a
tool developer?
The icons should prove useful, particularly if they link to the underlying
document? I wonder if there is a way to differentiate them other than color?
Most of the resounding silence might be due to the fact that they're good
and the best notes will come from those less familiar with the field.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 20:34:51 UTC