- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:20:42 -0500 (EST)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
These are good questions, and I am not sure that I have a sense of the answers. I guess in a more general sense an idea of what is helpful in getting the message across to developers is what I am looking for - most particularly from the developers on this list. I guess the answers will vary... cheers Charles On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, William Loughborough wrote: At 10:11 AM 1/23/01 -0500, Jutta Treviranus wrote: >The questions we will want to address are: I would like (as a member of EOWG) to find out which aspects of the EO effort (if any) affected the company's awareness of and attempts to improve accessibility problems in the product? Did this decision come about from concerns raised about inaccessibility by people like us? Did U.S. and various state regulations play a role? Did the business case arguments resonate with the management? -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 10:20:44 UTC