Re: Jan 9 Agenda

Added.

Please also review the draft prepared by Jan Richards to integrate the AERT
techniques into ATAG techniques and check that there are not things missing
or things that should not be there. (Long URI warning):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2000OctDec/att-0093/01-Techniques_for_Authoring_Tool_Accessibility_Guidelines_1_04.htm

Cheers

Charles McCN

On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Leonard R. Kasday wrote:

  Suggestions for the agenda at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/meetings/9jan01.html

  Re Evaluation (and Repair) language (EARL) which is already on the agenda:

  What would motivate authoring tool designers to input EARL?  To output
  EARL?  E.g., to avoid need to do all testing, to address test results from
  third party.

  What should authoring tool do to make application of EARL easier (e.g. id
  on each element)


  Possible additional topic:
  Also discussion of plenary.  How to coordinate meetings?  Have one big
  meeting?  Whom to invite?


  Len
  --
  Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
  Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple
  University
  (215) 204-2247 (voice)                 (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
  http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday         mailto:kasday@acm.org

  Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/

  The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant:
  http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
until 6 January 2001 at:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 12:37:18 UTC