- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 17:24:43 -0500 (EST)
- To: pjenkins@us.ibm.com
- cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
If it passes WCAG AAA then it doesn't need to pass Bobby... I presume you are not talking about producing PDF templates. I would suggest for print good that it comes out as well as common sites around (pick a few from your bookmarks list). There is a printCSS implementation in Amaya, if anyone wants to test it out. cheers Charles McCN On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote: Please comment on my new prioritized goals for templates: 1. Must pass WCAG AAA 2. Must look good, sound good, Braille good, and print good: "Look good" means it looks good on Nav4, IE4, IE5, and Opera "Sound good" on IBM Home Page Reader and PW WebSpeak "Braille good" on latest screen readers w/Braille display "print good" means ? [dare I say pdf] 3. Should pass BOBBY. 4. Should be valid code Jutta wrote: >... My sense of the priorities is: >should pass WCAG AAA which can be further verified by the tests you listed. pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote: > > >Some things I wanted to discuss is the scope of the template: >In priority order: >1. Must look good, sound good, Braille good, and print good: > "Look good" means it looks good on Nav4, IE4, IE5, and Opera > "Sound good" on IBM Home Page Reader and PW WebSpeak > "Braille good" on JFW 3.5? on Windows w/Braille display > "print good" means ? >2. Should pass BOBBY. >3. Should be valid code. -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2000 17:24:46 UTC