- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 17:24:43 -0500 (EST)
- To: pjenkins@us.ibm.com
- cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
If it passes WCAG AAA then it doesn't need to pass Bobby...
I presume you are not talking about producing PDF templates. I would suggest
for print good that it comes out as well as common sites around (pick a few
from your bookmarks list). There is a printCSS implementation in Amaya, if
anyone wants to test it out.
cheers
Charles McCN
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote:
Please comment on my new prioritized goals for templates:
1. Must pass WCAG AAA
2. Must look good, sound good, Braille good, and print good:
"Look good" means it looks good on Nav4, IE4, IE5, and Opera
"Sound good" on IBM Home Page Reader and PW WebSpeak
"Braille good" on latest screen readers w/Braille display
"print good" means ? [dare I say pdf]
3. Should pass BOBBY.
4. Should be valid code
Jutta wrote:
>... My sense of the priorities is:
>should pass WCAG AAA which can be further verified by the tests you
listed.
pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
>Some things I wanted to discuss is the scope of the template:
>In priority order:
>1. Must look good, sound good, Braille good, and print good:
> "Look good" means it looks good on Nav4, IE4, IE5, and Opera
> "Sound good" on IBM Home Page Reader and PW WebSpeak
> "Braille good" on JFW 3.5? on Windows w/Braille display
> "print good" means ?
>2. Should pass BOBBY.
>3. Should be valid code.
--
Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2000 17:24:46 UTC