Re: Meeting Wednesday afternoon

Sorry that you had difficulty getting on. Several other people also
reported problems. We will check with the administrator.

Please send the rough draft for comment. My sense of the priorities is:
should pass WCAG AAA which can be further verified by the tests you listed.

Jutta

At 4:26 PM -0500 3/1/00, pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote:
>I have tried 3 time to call in - all circuits are busy message is all I
>get!  Sounds like a Boston area phone problem.  I'll try again in a few
>minutes to see if the circuits are available.
>
>I have a rough draft of an accessible template.
>
>Some things I wanted to discuss is the scope of the template:
>In priority order:
>1. Must look good, sound good, Braille good, and print good:
>     "Look good" means it looks good on Nav4, IE4, IE5, and Opera
>     "Sound good" on IBM Home Page Reader and PW WebSpeak
>     "Braille good" on JFW 3.5? on Windows w/Braille display
>     "print good" means ?
>2. Should pass BOBBY.
>3. Should be valid code.
>
>
>Regards,
>Phill Jenkins
>
>
>
>
>To be more specific we will review progress on action items agreed to last
>week and assess what additional action items are needed. The action items
>were:
>
>Phil and Greg: Accessible Templates
>Jan: Techniques to meet several checkpoints at once
>Dick and others at Microsoft: actual implementation examples
>Charles: Relative priority checkpoints
>William: The hundred mile view
>Jan: illustrations of existing implementations
>Jutta and ATRC staff: example implementations in courseware tools and ER
>imports
>
>Jutta
>At 10:31 AM -0500 3/1/00, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>>(We have a temporary publishing problem so there is no agenda online -
>sorry)
>>
>>Phone +1.617.252.7000 - 4pm Boston time, 2100Z, your mileage may vary.
>>
>>Discussion of techniques and testing.
>>
>>Anything else?
>>
>>Charles McCN

Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2000 16:49:49 UTC