- From: Marjolein Katsma <access@javawoman.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 19:47:49 +0200
- To: fred@eatel.net, Authoring Tools Guidelines List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
You are perfectly correct, of course. Even for viewing in an external browser a save is not strictly necessary. My point was that some working methods require frequent saves (some other tools than a browser, for instance a links checker, do work only on disk-based files, not on code in memory) - it's not the tool itself that requires it. At 10:22 2000-05-19 -0500, Frederick J. Barnett wrote: >On stardate 19 May 2000, Charles McCathieNevile sent a subspace communication stating: > > > The first piece about a prompt at save time is an implementation decision - it > > applies to a tool like homesite, which requires another app to preview and > > therefore needs the document to be saved, but it is irrelevant to a WYSIWYG tool > > in many cases, especially a multi-view, stylesheet capable tool like amaya. > > > HomeSite doesn't "require" another app to preview. It does have a builtin, >totally separate previewer. You can use IE with it in order to get more >functionality, but you don't have to have it. Also, even with IE HS doesn't >have to save the document. It can be set to only save a temp file, then preview >that. Since the temp file isn't the actual document, a prompt for ALT text, >etc., likely wouldn't come up as we're presently discussing a prompt at saving. > > >Frederick J. Barnett http://www.eatel.net/~fred/ >E-mail: fred@eatel.net >Member: HWG Governing Board & Assistant Secretary >http://www.hwg.org/ Marjolein Katsma HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/ Bookstore for Webmasters - http://hshelp.com/bookstore/bookstore.html
Received on Friday, 19 May 2000 13:48:13 UTC