- From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:54:19 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
In discussing the issue of what is a prompt and what would constitute compliance with guideline 3.1, it becomes apparent that we have a contradiction in our documents. In both (Guideline and Technique) Glossary of Terms and Definitions sections we have the following definition: "A "prompt" is a request for author input, either information or a decision. A prompt requires author response. For example, a text equivalent entry field prominently displayed in an image insertion dialog would constitute a prompt. Prompts can be used to encourage authors to provide information needed to make content accessible (such as alternative text equivalents). " Which seems contradictory in and of itself. This is complicated by the technique text following guideline 4 where we speak of prompts in the following terms: "Prompts can be used to encourage authors to provide information needed to make the content accessible (such as alternative text equivalents). Prompts are simple requests for information. For example, a text equivalent entry field prominently displayed in an image insertion dialog would constitute a prompt. Prompts are relatively unintrusive and address a problem before it arises. However, once the author has ignored the prompt, its message is unavailable." We seem to be suggesting that on the one hand prompts require an author response and on the other hand that they are relatively unintrusive and are instruments of encouragement. I think the spirit of what we want is that prompts should provide noticeable encouragement without demanding immediate author response. Therefore I suggest we delete the sentence "A prompt requires author response" from both Definition sections. I also suggest that we delete the sentence "However, once the author has ignored the prompt, its message is unavailable" from the technique section, given that that is not always the case with our broader definition of prompt. In the technique document we also need to make it clear that we are not adhering to the restrictive definition of prompt used in several software development toolkits but a broader definition of prompting. Jutta
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2000 15:45:02 UTC