- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 08:10:22 -0600
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, "'Jutta Treviranus'" <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <unagi69@concentric.net>, "'Authoring Tools Guidelines List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Sounds like a good idea to me too. Gregg (Gregory, we should talk again on this. We're still at P3, but I always like to recheck and discuss to make sure we/re not missing something when two sets of good heads come up with different answers. Make sure we both are looking at same information with same rulers.) -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 4:01 PM To: Jutta Treviranus Cc: Gregory J. Rosmaita; Authoring Tools Guidelines List Subject: Re: ATAG PR: improving RP definition Yes. I think we had in fact decided we would like to (I know I had). Charles On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jutta Treviranus wrote: I have no objections to changing the example used. Jutta At 1:59 PM -0500 11/2/99, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: >aloha, charles! > >as long as you are contemplating a change in the wording of the explanation of >Relative Priority, please reconsider the use of ACRONYM and ABBR as your P3 >example... > >as documented in my exchange with phil jenkins on the w3c-wai-au list, in >posts >archived at: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0092.html >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0093.html >and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0096.html > >i am adamantly opposed to the use of ACRONYM and ABBR in the Relative Priority >example, as they are far more important to accessibility (and >interoperability) >than the P3 accorded them by WCAG... > >yes, i know that WCAG as it stands today does accord the use of ACRONYM and >ABBR a P3, but there has been much debate on several WAI lists as to the >importance of the use of ACRONYM and ABBR (as well as their expansion slash >exposition to user agents), and it would, therefore, behoove us to use a less >controversial example, several of which are provided in the posts cited >above... > >gregory. >-------------------------------------------------------- >He that lives on Hope, dies farting > -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763 >-------------------------------------------------------- >Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net> > WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC > <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html> >-------------------------------------------------------- --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 1999 09:10:19 UTC