- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 18:21:42 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- cc: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Having reviewed briefly the references in the techniques for 7.1 the only documents which clearly prioritise guidelines according to their impact on people with disabilities are the W3C gidelines - Web Content and User Agent Accessiblity Guidelines respectively. The guidelines at http://www.microsoft.com/enable/download/dev/win_guidelines/winapp23.txt have a priority scheme which is different from that used by the W3C guidelines. The EITAAC guidelines that I found in the final report do not prioritise requirements, although they do provide general requirements and requirements for specific technologies. I therefore propose to refer to the two W3C documents as informative aids in determining the priority of requirements in other, unprioritsed checkl;ists nad guidelines (although I will try to say it in english in the document). Charles McCN --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 22 October 1999 18:21:43 UTC