Re: Techniques for 7.1

Looks like a good approach.

Thanks,

Judy

At 06:21 PM 10/22/99 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>Having reviewed briefly the references in the techniques for 7.1 the only
>documents which clearly prioritise guidelines according to their impact on
>people with disabilities are the W3C gidelines - Web Content and User Agent
>Accessiblity Guidelines respectively.
>
>The guidelines at
>http://www.microsoft.com/enable/download/dev/win_guidelines/winapp23.txt have
>a priority scheme which is different from that used by the W3C guidelines.
>
>The EITAAC guidelines that I found in the final report do not prioritise
>requirements, although they do provide general requirements and requirements
>for specific technologies.
>
>I therefore propose to refer to the two W3C documents as informative aids in
>determining the priority of requirements in other, unprioritsed checkl;ists
>nad guidelines (although I will try to say it in english in the document).
>
>Charles McCN
>
>--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
>phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
>W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
>MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
>
----------
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Received on Friday, 22 October 1999 18:55:24 UTC