- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 00:23:51 +0200
- To: Sandy Ressler <sressler@NIST.GOV>
- cc: love26@gorge.net, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
> Perhaps...but these ARE authoring guidelines...and to be pragmatic about > it, I like the idea of a placeholder going into the draft so it doesn't > get completely dropped off the radar. A placeholder in the AU draft is not the right way to ensure that VRML stays on the WAI agenda. My plan would be to first build an assessment of the technology itself in the PF group (Protocols&Formats WAI group dealing with reviewing and improving HTML, CSS, SMIL, etc), and you and your group's work is clearly what we need to start from. Then we can look at guidelines for what need to go in a VRML file itself to help accessibility. Then we can tackle guidelines for viewer and editor of VRML.
Received on Saturday, 30 May 1998 18:23:37 UTC