- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:58:45 +0900
- To: kroll_@yahoo.com
- Cc: www-validator@w3c.org, w3c-translators@w3c.org
[ Note: The former part of this message would be more appropriate for the www-validator list rather than the w3c-translators list, so I'm moving to www-validator ] Croll <kroll_@yahoo.com> wrote: > You stand for the Web internationalization, but how > can it be reached, if no support for my language is > available? > For example, I tried to validate my page (it was in > russian and the lang and xml:lang attributes were "ru" > which satnded for Russian) > but the validator said to me it is an "invalid > language"! Is it? Could you show us which page you were trying to validate? Although internationalization/multilingualization/localization support in the validator is still rather weak, I don't think "language" is that relevant, as far as SGML/XML validation is concerned. At least, the validator doesn't check the validity of language codes, as far as I know. Character encoding would be more relevant to perform the correct validation, and I suppose the validator can validate documents encoded in ISO-8859-5 (by chance), but will not work well with documents encoded in KOI8-R, windows-1251 or KOI8-U. Which character encoding are you using for your page? "Add support for more character encodings" is among the to-do list for the validator, and I hope this will be improved soon (as some people have already provided patches for this ...). cf. http://validator.w3.org/todo.html Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2001 10:58:03 UTC