- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:05:55 -0500
- To: Charles@sgmlsource.com
- CC: sjd@ebt.com, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>The point I was trying to make (which I see now has nothing to do with >transclusion) does concern whether an entity referenced by a syntactic entity >reference must be accessed and parsed. According to 8879, it must >but, as Steve correctly points out, the application -- as with any >pcdata -- may choose whether or not to show it to the user after >parsing it. > >The only way to avoid this required access and parsing is to use an entity >attribute. If this is indeed the letter of the law, then the law is not very applicable to XML. As I pointed out before, once there are restrictions on the structure of entities, the *need* for accessing the entities is removed.
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 1996 10:07:40 UTC