- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:57:18 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
In the absence of arguments that this change is editorial and not substantive, I ask that the chairs reopen the PR decision, in order to consider the resolution of Herman's last call comments which triggered this change. [This is nullified if Pat or others, can make a compelling case that I have misunderstood the situation, and the correct understanding of the two test cases is the same in both LC2 semantics and the current editors draft] Sorry Jeremy relevent test cases > > rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test002 > > rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test004
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:57:43 UTC