- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:38:24 -0600
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 09:10, Jan Grant wrote: [...] > Item 7: document status. I would very much prefer that the record cite the then-current specs in detail. > Reiteration of process: ANY changes to the document must be circulated > to the WG for chairs to pass as editorial or schedule time on. > > Item 7a: Syntax. i.e. Editor's Draft of W3C Working Draft 7 November 2003 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/ Last-Modified: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:58:37 GMT Content-Length: 194594 yes? Are there any supplementary files? figures? > Item 7b: Schema 10 October 2003 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:33:20 GMT Content-Length: 81702 yes? > Item 7c: Semantics http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_LC2.5.html 241190 bytes md5sum 4971ab5c4859eb5aad49830aa2860a1d Last-Modified: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:53:06 GMT > > Item 7d: Primer "W3C Editor's Draft 04 November 2003" http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/Overview.html Last-Modified: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:27:20 GMT > Item 7e: test cases "10 October 2003" http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-testcases-20030117/ Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:40:06 GMT Hmm... test cases is horribly difficult to cite completely, since the contents are sorta strewn around. Oh well... > Item 7f: Concepts "10 October 2003" http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/ Content-Length: 95337 Last-Modified: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:20:00 GMT > Item 9: next steps/schedule. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030331-advance > > JosD indicated he'd reviewed this. > > Proposed (DanC) for the WG to decide to request PR with > today's docs + changes agreed by DanC, BWM, and respective > editor. where "today's docs" refers to those above. > In a straw poll, all were in favour. Some particular reservations were > expressed: > JanG: test case manifest change may need attention > BWM: yes, subject to adequate implementation report (happy for > DanC/BWM to decide that) > > Formally (no seconder recorded): the proposal carried, with no > abstentions and no objections. > > > The meeting adjourned. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 12:38:25 UTC