- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:41:26 +0200
- To: ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I second Jeremy's proposal. This is water under the bridge... Patrick On 2003-11-07 16:38, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > > > I propose that we reject the comments in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html > > with headings > > - Treatment of language information for XML Literals: > - XML Literals as typed literals > > and send the following reply: > > [[ > > Dear Martin, > > thank you for your comments. > > This message replies to the two comments > > - Treatment of language information for XML Literals: > - XML Literals as typed literals > > We regret that we have decided to reject these comments. > > A rationale can be found in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/att-0275/i18n-par > t.html > > (with the addition of the link to the following msg which is the webont > endorsement of the current design: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0039.html > ) > > Please reply cc-ing www-rdf-comments as to whether you accept this or not, > and if you wish to formally object. > > thanks again > > Jeremy Carroll > > ]] > > > > >
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 09:43:43 UTC