Re: concepts actions status

I have done a lot of the things on the list I posted yesterday:
(in particular all that impact the text)


> 
> Issue to check williams-02
> =====================
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0128.html


> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0138.html
>  jjc Review concepts to make consequential changes concerning typed literals
>  jjc Provide anchor for rdf:XMLLiteral to Pat Hayes
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html


> 20030502#12 jjc update the Concepts WD with words after discussion with PatH 
> and GK based on 2003Apr/0368.html text
> (have not had the discussion)
> 15:26:16 <db-scribe> bwm: to jjc, maybe need to point ot last para of 
> explanation
> 15:26:29 <db-scribe> jjc: asks path for help rewording, editorially after 
> decision
> 15:27:27 <bwm> ack gk
> 15:27:27 <Zakim> gk, you wanted to suggest a small tweak to jeremy's proposal
> 15:27:28 <Zakim> * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
> 15:27:36 <db-scribe> jjc points out rewording of first sentence
> 15:27:47 <db-scribe> gkgk: asks that it be made more inclusive as first 
> setence, broader


Discussion started.

> 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0097.html
> 2003-03-28#9
> jjc update Concepts in light of XML Schema LC review editorial comments
> ACTION: jeremy to add anchors to Concepts for def of canonicalistion, and for 
> Impl Note
> 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0138.html
> 
> ACTION 2003-03-21#6 jjc: review
>   
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-rdf-graph
>   in concepts WD after proposal to change in
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0114.html
>   and circulate changes to the WG.
> 
> ACTION 2003-03-21#7 jjc: review 
>   
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-blank-nodes
>   in concepts WD after proposal to change in
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0114.html
>   and propose change/non-change or further clarification to the WG.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0082.html
> ACTION 2003-02-07#2 (jjc) ensure CONCEPTS is accurate on its use of
>         subject/predicate/object terminology
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

All of the above actions are now complete.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 05:53:19 UTC