Re: thumbs up for RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema from Brian McBride on 2003-01-15 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from January 2003)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:56:50 +0000
To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030115135501.0327ad18@localhost>

Thanks Jos, good catch.

At 12:38 15/01/2003 +0100, Jos De_Roo wrote:

[...]

>| rdf:XMLLiteral
>|       rdfs:comment
>|             "The class of XML literals." ;
>|       a     rdfs:Class ;
>
>according to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/
>that should be
>         a     rdfs:Datatype ;

I suggest that should be fixed.  Danbri - do you agree?

[...]

>|
>| rdfs:Datatype
>|       rdfs:comment
>|             "The class of RDF datatypes." ;
>|       a     rdfs:Class ;
>|       rdfs:label
>|             "Datatype" ;
>|       rdfs:isDefinedBy
>|             rdfs: .
>
>according to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/
>that should add
>         rdfs:subClassOf     rdfs:Class ;

Again, that looks like something we should fix.  Danbri?

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 08:55:40 UTC