- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:30:55 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-01-15 13:56+0000] > Thanks Jos, good catch. > > At 12:38 15/01/2003 +0100, Jos De_Roo wrote: > > [...] > > >| rdf:XMLLiteral > >| rdfs:comment > >| "The class of XML literals." ; > >| a rdfs:Class ; > > > >according to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > >that should be > > a rdfs:Datatype ; > > I suggest that should be fixed. Danbri - do you agree? Assuming usual disclaimers w.r.t. my knowledge of latest trends in RDF datatyping formalisms, yes, sounds like a good catch. > [...] > > >| > >| rdfs:Datatype > >| rdfs:comment > >| "The class of RDF datatypes." ; > >| a rdfs:Class ; > >| rdfs:label > >| "Datatype" ; > >| rdfs:isDefinedBy > >| rdfs: . > > > >according to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > >that should add > > rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class ; > > Again, that looks like something we should fix. Danbri? Ditto. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 10:32:00 UTC