- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:48:50 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Brian McBride wrote: > > Pat has managed to get an updated LCC semantics doc to me. It seemed best > to load it immediately to the website, which I have done. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > > There are no accompanying change notes, so I'm not sure what's > changed. However, based on my conversation with him, I'm expecting that: > > o he has fixed the problem Peter raised about rdfs:Literal > o he has made at least one other change in response to a comment from Jan. > > Peter, could you take a look and see if it does indeed resolve the issue > you raised? > > Other reviewers, could you check any critical issues you raised are > dealt with. The closure rules now include all XML literals with the appropriate canonical form, which means simple entailment now works. In fact, I see Pat's added a paragraph to that effect after the statement of the RDF entailment lemma. That addresses the only critical issue I had with that document. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Spreadsheet through network. Oh yeah.
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 08:51:50 UTC