Re: Critical typo in Schema doc regarding rdfs:isDefinedBy

Since Danbri hasn't responded, let me stick in a few words here:

At 10:35 14/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

[...]

> > > ... Hmm...
> > > note that it
> > > does say "indicates *the* resource defining the subject
> > > resource" [emphasis
> > > added], which seems to imply that you can only specify a single
> > > rdfs:isDefinedBy property for a resource. Might be worth an
> > > rdf-comments
> > > mail, but I reckon it's a typo (should be "a resource").
> >
> > It's surely a typo. One can have multiple rdfs:isDefinedBy
> > values, where each provide a component of the definition
> > (e.g. just one example, separate RDF Schemas that define
> > labels and comments for particular languages, where a given
> > term then has definition in as many schemas as there are
> > languages defined.
> >
> > I'll ping the editor on this.
>
>This may have already been caught, but I consider this
>to be a critical error that must be fixed before last
>call.

Hmm, I can't find the text you complain of in the last call candidate.

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/#ch_isdefinedby

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 05:07:55 UTC