- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:35:45 +0200
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Sent: 14 January, 2003 10:33 > To: 'DCMI Architecture Group' > Subject: RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy revisited > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ext Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@MYSTERYLIGHTS.COM] > > Sent: 13 January, 2003 22:34 > > To: DC-ARCHITECTURE@jiscmail.ac.uk > > Subject: Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy revisited > > > > ... Hmm... > > note that it > > does say "indicates *the* resource defining the subject > > resource" [emphasis > > added], which seems to imply that you can only specify a single > > rdfs:isDefinedBy property for a resource. Might be worth an > > rdf-comments > > mail, but I reckon it's a typo (should be "a resource"). > > It's surely a typo. One can have multiple rdfs:isDefinedBy > values, where each provide a component of the definition > (e.g. just one example, separate RDF Schemas that define > labels and comments for particular languages, where a given > term then has definition in as many schemas as there are > languages defined. > > I'll ping the editor on this. This may have already been caught, but I consider this to be a critical error that must be fixed before last call. Cheers, Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 03:35:50 UTC