- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 05:28:17 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-01-15 09:18+0000] > > Since Danbri hasn't responded, let me stick in a few words here: > > At 10:35 14/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > [...] > > >> > ... Hmm... > >> > note that it > >> > does say "indicates *the* resource defining the subject > >> > resource" [emphasis > >> > added], which seems to imply that you can only specify a single > >> > rdfs:isDefinedBy property for a resource. Might be worth an > >> > rdf-comments > >> > mail, but I reckon it's a typo (should be "a resource"). > >> > >> It's surely a typo. One can have multiple rdfs:isDefinedBy > >> values, where each provide a component of the definition > >> (e.g. just one example, separate RDF Schemas that define > >> labels and comments for particular languages, where a given > >> term then has definition in as many schemas as there are > >> languages defined. > >> > >> I'll ping the editor on this. > > > >This may have already been caught, but I consider this > >to be a critical error that must be fixed before last > >call. > > Hmm, I can't find the text you complain of in the last call candidate. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/#ch_isdefinedby Yup, the offending text has gone. Sadly imho but <shrug/> I'll use regex string hacking to split property URIs into namespace and name instead. So this shouldn't be an issue any more. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 05:28:21 UTC