- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:31:16 +0300
- To: <GK@NineByNine.org>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Graham Klyne [mailto:GK@NineByNine.org] > Sent: 07 April, 2003 11:18 > To: Jeremy Carroll; dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: tex-01 new proposal > > > > At 15:33 04/04/2003 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > On this one, I don't see any harm in having parsers transpose lang > > > tags to lowercase and NTriples only having lowercase lang tags. > > > > >I do not like NTriples being changed in this way, that seems > to make things > >worse from the point of view of tex's comment. > > I note that the role of (RDF/XML) parsers is to create an > abstract syntax > graph from RDF/XML input, not N-triples. I think *requiring* > parsers to > case-normalize is over-specification, and I think the > case-agnostic view > for the abstract syntax proposed by Jeremy is about right. [**] > > But adopting a convention for N-triples, which is a concrete > representation > of an abstract syntax graph, that case-insensitive values are > presented as > lower case seems to address the other concerns I have heard. This sounds like an excellent middle ground. Patrick > #g > -- > > [**] Note: this doesn't mean that parsers MUST NOT > case-normalize where > appropriate: that is an implementation decision. > > > ------------------- > Graham Klyne > <GK@NineByNine.org> > PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E > >
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 09:31:32 UTC