- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:34:46 +0100
- To: "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: GK <GK@NineByNine.org>, jjc <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>"Patrick.Stickler" said: > > From: ext Graham Klyne [mailto:GK@NineByNine.org] > > But adopting a convention for N-triples, which is a concrete > > representation > > of an abstract syntax graph, that case-insensitive values are > > presented as > > lower case seems to address the other concerns I have heard. > > This sounds like an excellent middle ground. I think that's OK. So let's move on to concrete changes. For N-Triples, we are proposing that one case (lower) is required to match the single case in the abstract syntax graph. This is already the case: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#language So nothing need be done. That means the examples/test cases that were flying around were illegal N-Triples. That's OK since Jeremy has already agreed to change them to be RDF/XML test cases with variant case. Dave
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 09:37:04 UTC