- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:59:22 -0600
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 23:06, pat hayes wrote: >> >> After reading through the Primer, particularly section 4, I propose >> that almost all of section 3 of the semantics document be simply >> removed. > >I don't know what's in section 3 of the semantics document. Sorry. In any case I mis-cited it, I should have said section 3.2. It contains the 'informal' description of the parts that have no formal semantics, notably reification, containers and collections: http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_finalCall.html#ReifAndCont (3.2.4 in there is going to get re-written this evening to reflect the change suggested in my earlier message.) The corresponding parts of Frank's primer are http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-primer-20021124/#othercapabilities >I'd appreciate pointers whenever documents are mentioned. > > > It's all in the primer section 4. >> >> Semantics section 3 should just list the RDF vocabulary that isn't >> being given a formal meaning, say explicitly that it isn't, and refer >> to the Primer for the informal meaning. If anyone feels that there >> are any subtleties in section 3 that aren't in the primer text as it >> stands, then lets put them into it. I don't think there are many, if >> any, in fact. >> >> Anyone object? Frank?? >> >> Pat >> -- >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IHMC (850)434 8903 home >> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >> FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell > > phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes >> s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 11:59:47 UTC