Re: pruning the semantics document

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 23:06, pat hayes wrote:
> 
> After reading through the Primer, particularly section 4, I propose 
> that almost all of section 3 of the semantics document be simply 
> removed.

I don't know what's in section 3 of the semantics document.
I'd appreciate pointers whenever documents are mentioned.

> It's all in the primer section 4.
> 
> Semantics section 3 should just list the RDF vocabulary that isn't 
> being given a formal meaning, say explicitly that it isn't, and refer 
> to the Primer for the informal meaning. If anyone feels that there 
> are any subtleties in section 3 that aren't in the primer text as it 
> stands, then lets put them into it. I don't think there are many, if 
> any, in fact.
> 
> Anyone object? Frank??
> 
> Pat
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola               			(850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32501            				(850)291 0667    cell
> phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
> s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 09:04:25 UTC