- From: by way of <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:40:08 -0400
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[freed from the spam filter -rrs] Message-ID: <4958.998408120@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:35:27 -0400 (EDT) To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org In-Reply-To: Message from Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> of "Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:29:38 CDT." <3B827E62.CEDDF5FE@w3.org> From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> >>>Dan Connolly said: > Dave Beckett wrote: > [...] > > I thought the spec was pretty clear on this: propAttrs > can only express literal values. True, but rdf:type is not a propAttr - it has its own grammar term and takes a URI(-reference) as value: [6.10] propAttr ::= typeAttr | propName '="' string '"' (with embedded quotes escaped) [6.11] typeAttr ::= ' type="' URI-reference '"' see? So rdf:type takes URI, other rdf:subject etc. things take strings, But we know from RDF M&S, rdf:subject, rdf:predicate only take URIs etc. see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0106.html for rest of argument. <snip/> > Since there's evident divergence of interpretation/implementation, > please do add it to the test suite/issues list. That is the idea Dave
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 11:42:01 UTC