- From: R.V.Guha <guha@alpiri.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:01:06 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
In the spirit of considering changes to what exists, I'd like to propose that we at least consider the following: RDF M&S puts too many things in one "layer". Maybe we should have a core which does nothing but define the triple model (and maybe a syntax). Then comes schema concepts like Class, domain etc. Then come layers for container, reification, etc. This will help us put RDF on a firmer logical basis, help explain it, help implementations, ... Maybe the new thing is not called RDF, but xRDF or something like that. guha Dan Connolly wrote: > > Of course: just make no changes to the language. > > Another possibility is, as I said, to retrospectively change > the language we call http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#. > But that seems rude to all the folks that implemented it. > And even if we eventually do that, there's no harm > in using other names for the language that we design in > the mean time. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 20 April 2001 13:02:52 UTC