- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 21:32:13 +0100
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>[...] > Sorry your not going to make the phone conference. Graham can't make it > either. I hope that not too many folks will me missing. The main item > on the agenda is going to be issues up for discussion. It would be good > if you could send round your thoughts on email, even if its I don't > care. this is what I (currently) think about some issues up for discussion: -> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion all of the RDF attributes are qualified with a RDF namespace -> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-quoting introduce rdf:parseType="Quote" testcase http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/mn3.rdf -> Jena and Sirpac as if rdf:parseType="Literal"; what about the others? -> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements the value is the empty literal -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2001 15:41:41 UTC