- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 14:20:26 -0400
- To: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 01:55 pm, John Boyer wrote: > In conclusion, this means that if an empty node-set is given as input to > an Xpath 2.0 filter, returning an empty node-set would be behavior > consistent with the XPath 1.0 recommendation and with the XPath filter > 1.0 in the XML DSig recommendation. To throw an error would be > inconsistent. Yes, I prefer this and its what I meant when I said, "We could add a processing step that says if the input node-set is empty the transform is done." [1] I changed it to the error [2] because I feared I was alone, but now that you've clarified it further perhaps Gregor and Merlin might agree too? <smile/> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002AprJun/0216.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002AprJun/0218.html
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 14:21:38 UTC