- From: <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 19:31:24 -0400
- To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Is there any point in the current draft which would need to be changed to make allowances for someone to define a "manually verifiable" signature technique in this connection? It may be out of scope, and it won't be completely ready in time for the final recommendation, but it consists of the following: 1 A new value for SignatureMethod "manuallySignedDigest". This value for SignatureMethod implies that the SignatureValue itself consists of the base 64 encoding of the message digest and is not signed. This method's main parameter is a reference to a SignatureProperty containing the manual signature. It might also accept a parameter giving the data type of the manual signature. 2 The manual signature itself, in a SignatureProperty. This manual signature should contain a voice recording, transcribed signature, or the like which is performed by the user (signed with handwriting or spoken) and in which the user him/herself records the message digest. This technique is not automatically verifiable, so it may not be in scope for this group. However, it is a way of performing a general electronic signature using mainly pieces from the current XMLDSIG specification. The software verification of such a document will perform a digest verification, but then a human will have to verify the actual signature. Tom Gindin
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2000 19:53:13 UTC