- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:09:54 -0500
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> The choices that I see are > > 1) we just define that RFC2396-defined relative URI resolution takes place > (also defining what the base URL is in each case), > > 2) 1) + descriptive text or > > 3) something different that is compatible to 1), but disallows some specific > cases. > > I'd vote for 1) (because that's what RFC2518 says and I haven't seen any > convincing reason to change it yet). Any of these are fine with me. (1) is fine with me if it indicates what the base URL is as you suggest. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 14:15:14 UTC