- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:29:04 -0500
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> > > 5) Section 6.3, p3 > > > > > > Replace > > > > > > "However resources are free to return any URI scheme so long as it meets > the > > > uniqueness requirements." > > > > > > by > > > > > > "However servers are free to use any IETF-registered URI scheme so long > as > > > it meets the uniqueness requirements." > > > > I'd vote for leaving the old text. > > Hmmm. > > Do we disagree on > > a) the fact that it must be registered, or > > b) whether or not it needs to be stated? b) There are a number of issues about how to insure uniqueness. We don't need to cover all the mistakes they might make doing it. > See also: > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme>: If available, a reference to another document advising how to insure uniqueness should be fine. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 14:30:20 UTC