source link, was: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-03.txt from Julian Reschke on 2003-03-14 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from January to March 2003)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:32:51 +0100
To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOEDJGMAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:26 AM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-03.txt
>
>  ...
>
> > 31) Section 18.6, Reduction of Security due to Source Link
> >
> > can be removed
> I tend to think 18.6 isn't necessary.  I'm not heavily in to a lot of this
sort of thing
> any more, but even to me it seems obvious.

:-) My point was that if there's no description of a source link in the
document, we don't need to discuss it's security risk as well.

> ..

Julian



--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 09:41:42 UTC