- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 14:04:19 PST
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
12.9 says "The server is free to withhold any or all of this information if the requesting principal does not have sufficient access rights to see the requested data." If the server does not wish to inform caller of, say, the owner, then should it generate an empty owner or should it leave it out of the activelock altogether? The latter would violate the syntax of activelock, as only depth is optional. I am not sure whether all the other elements of activelock are defined to allow them to be empty. If any of them are, then we have an inconsistency. If all of them allow empty, then the spec should add language telling what to do.
Received on Saturday, 24 January 1998 17:24:55 UTC