- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 10:27:24 -0800
- To: "'WEBDAV WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Caught by the spam filter. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: Roland Grassmann [SMTP:grassmann@itwm-trier.fhg.de] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 1998 12:23 AM To: Yaron Goland Cc: 'howard.s.modell@boeing.com'; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: [Spam?] RE: v6: 12.9 lockdiscovery Yaron Goland writes: > The provisions is that lock discovery returns all outstanding locks, who > owns them, and what the lock tokens are. Thus a program that finds it is > denied access because of a lock can perform discovery and find out that it > is the one with the lock. > Hi, maybe this is a slightly different issue, but shouldn't users also be able to request a listing of all locks owned by them, not only all locks pretaining to a specific resource. If, for example user A has locked resources X and Y and forgot all about having locked X, shouldn't he be able to ask for a list of all ressources he locked. This would enable him to release X (or carry on working on it)? As far as I understand the current mechanism it only allows A to ask for a list of all users having locked Y. If he doesn't know -- or remember -- that checking for locks on X would be a good idea for him, he won't be able to find out, would he? Greetings from Germany roland -- Roland Grassmann Institut fuer Telematik Bahnhofstrasse 30-32 grassmann@ti.fhg.de 54292 Trier, Germany
Received on Thursday, 5 February 1998 14:22:42 UTC