>> data:<h1>%20id=%22FOO%22>ABC</h1>#FOO > > No, it's not undefined. But yes, RFC 2397 really needs an update to > align it with RFC 3986. Thanks for the answer. With undefined I mean "this string is not something, that's defined in RFC 2397". Apart from that, could you point me to any normative statement about "#" in data URIs? (I've got the impression from RFC 3986, that "data" in 2397 could be aligned with "hier-part" in 3986, which'd allow query parts and fragment identifiers, but I'm not sure, if that's the correct way to read it.) > That's a bug in Chrome. See > <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=123004>. Thanks for pointing me to that report! Cheers, ManuelReceived on Thursday, 18 July 2013 14:49:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:56 UTC