- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:35:34 +0200
- To: Manuel Strehl <svg@manuel-strehl.de>
- CC: uri@w3.org
On 2013-07-18 16:19, Manuel Strehl wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to find documentation about fragment identifiers for data URIs, > but haven't discovered any so far. RFC 2397 seems to be quiet about the > very possibility to have such identifiers. It's only noting, that "data" > is specified as "uric" from 2396 (which happens to exclude "#"). > Therefore it seems, the behavior of this is undefined: > > > data:<h1>%20id=%22FOO%22>ABC</h1>#FOO No, it's not undefined. But yes, RFC 2397 really needs an update to align it with RFC 3986. > I tested Firefox and Chrome, and both react differently, Firefox cutting > off the data: URI at the hash, Chrome just outputting it and the the rest. That's a bug in Chrome. See <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=123004>. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 14:36:03 UTC