- From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:15:11 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>, John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, "Jungshik SHIN (신정식)" <jshin1987@gmail.com>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>, "idna-update@alvestrand.no" <idna-update@alvestrand.no>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "www-tag.w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>
On 22/08/13 11:52, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Yeah, that seems more sensible, avoids breaking a ton of URLs, and has > less potential for spoofing (given appropriate safeguards). Can you (or e.g. Google - Jungshik?) put some metrics behind that "ton"? The question is: how many domain names are there out there with live web pages which use any one of the characters permitted in IDNA2008 but not permitted in IDNA2008+TR46 (i.e. the non-alphabetic characters)? Gerv
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 12:15:49 UTC