W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Standardizing on IDNA 2003 in the URL Standard

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:52:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78iYMiYyZDJ_MCUNL3Y8O8_MbFFkf1NNZyxM7X=h5NY_PA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, Jungshik SHIN (신정식) <jshin1987@gmail.com>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>, "idna-update@alvestrand.no" <idna-update@alvestrand.no>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "www-tag.w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Shawn Steele
<Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I'd much prefer a mechanism to suggest a preferred display form.  That'd solve things like the Turkish I issue as well.

Yeah, that seems more sensible, avoids breaking a ton of URLs, and has
less potential for spoofing (given appropriate safeguards).

I don't buy the argument that then we should also alias 1 and l and o
and 0. Shawn's argument is about not making the status quo worse. We
could maybe make it better still, but that seems separate and given
what's deployed and relied upon unlikely.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:52:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:16 UTC