- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:52:24 +0100
- To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
- Cc: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, Jungshik SHIN (신정식) <jshin1987@gmail.com>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>, "idna-update@alvestrand.no" <idna-update@alvestrand.no>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "www-tag.w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> wrote: > I'd much prefer a mechanism to suggest a preferred display form. That'd solve things like the Turkish I issue as well. Yeah, that seems more sensible, avoids breaking a ton of URLs, and has less potential for spoofing (given appropriate safeguards). I don't buy the argument that then we should also alias 1 and l and o and 0. Shawn's argument is about not making the status quo worse. We could maybe make it better still, but that seems separate and given what's deployed and relied upon unlikely. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:52:57 UTC